More businesses are embracing the “buy one, donate one” model. But can they turn a profit while doing good?
New, clean underwear is one of the most under-donated items to charity, and domestic violence refuges and homeless shelters for women often face shortages.
So American Haley Besheer came up with an unusual way to tackle the problem.
The 20-something founded lingerie company Making a Difference Intimates (Madi), which donates a pair of its trendy knickers for every one that it sells.
Ms Besheer is following in the footsteps of other entrepreneurs motivated to do good, including US shoemaker Toms, which pioneered the “buy one, donate one” model in the early part of this decade.
And like Toms, her business fully intends to grow its profits while achieving its social mission.
“Consumers are attracted to the buy one, donate one model because it helps them give back,” she tells the BBC.
“The market is leaning more and more towards brands that offer quality products with a social purpose.”
Before starting Madi, Ms Besheer had no experience of designing fashion or running a business, and faced many challenges as she learned to do both.
For instance, a friend who was originally meant to help run Madi, backed out after deciding it was too risky. Ms Besheer understood her dilemma.
“She didn’t want to put any money into the business,” Ms Besheer says. “But you have to be fully committed, and you need to take out a lot of loans in the beginning.”
Madi’s underwear costs more than $30 (£23) per pair – considerably more than what lingerie retailer Victoria’s Secret charges for many of its premium-brand knickers.
Ms Besheer says her panties are fairly priced, because they are made from bamboo cloth – a material that is “more comfortable than cotton, more sustainable, and longer-lasting”.
People are also happy to pay more to support a good cause, says one customer, Lauren Cimpi.
“While one pair of Madi underwear may cost more than a similar panty in a department store, I feel you’re buying two pairs of underwear for the $30-or-so price tag,” Ms Cimpi says.
“Shopping is usually a self-focused activity, and there’s nothing wrong with that, but being able to give back while you’re shopping makes it even better.”
Brands with a social justice agenda can enjoy a powerful “halo effect”, say some experts.
According to a study published in the Journal of Consumer Research, consumers thought red wine tasted better, and other products – such as running shoes and hair loss treatments – performed better if they knew about a company’s charitable donations.
However, there are critics of the buy one, donate one model.
In the developing world, Toms was accused of fostering dependency and unfairly competing against local businesses by giving away its products.
Mindful of the criticism, the Californian company revamped its philanthropy, and now produces many of the shoes it donates in partnership with local manufacturers.
It also supports access to eye care, safe water initiatives, and anti-bullying programmes.
More stories from the BBC’s Business Brain series looking at interesting business topics from around the world:
“Our original goal was to produce one-third of the shoes we donated in these regions, and we have since exceeded that with local factories in Ethiopia, India, Kenya and Vietnam,” says Amy Smith, the company’s “chief giving officer”.
Although Toms’ founder and boss, Blake Mycoskie, lists his official title as “chief shoe giver”, he keeps a close eye on the company’s sales and profits.
In 2014, Mr Mycoskie sold half of his business to private equity giant Bain Capital in a deal that reportedly valued the firm at $625m.
But Toms, which is profitable, says it isn’t looking to make an easy buck at the expense of its mission.
“Toms has proven that conscious capitalism is a viable business model,” Ms Smith says. “But without our mission, the ‘why’ of Toms would be lost.”
Warby Parker, which sells fashionable glasses online, has also proved that the buy one, donate one model can work.
The privately held company has attracted deep-pocketed investors, such as General Catalyst, and has a valuation of more than $1bn. It may also be headed for an initial public offering, various media reports have suggested.
Warby Parker takes a different approach to its philanthropy than Toms. For every pair of glasses it sells, it makes a donation to a non-profit which will produce a pair in the country where it operates.
The non-profit also trains local people in how to conduct eye exams and fit glasses. According to Warby Parker, its system makes more sense than just donating goods.
“Donating is often a temporary solution, not a lasting one,” the firm says on its website. “It is rarely sustainable.”
Back at Madi, Ms Besheer says its sales have grown by 25% every quarter since it was founded three years ago.
The company expects to become profitable in about two years, and has no debt thanks to successful crowd-funding campaigns and partnerships with local retailers.
It also has donated more than 4,500 pairs of underwear in eight countries including Haiti, Panama, Cuba and Ecuador.
Ms Besheer now wants to set up a production line in Kansas City, where her company is based, so she can continue to produce Madi garments in the US without relying on subcontractors.
She says it is important to manufacture in America, so she can ensure workers are paid fairly, and to reduce the firm’s carbon footprint.
As for the buy one, donate one model, she feels it strikes the right balance.
“I feel that if we don’t address the underwear issue at refuges, no one else will. And if we can grow a successful business at the same time, that’s even better.”